Hi Maria,
I am not using PI to create PO. we are using interfaces to create po's through BAPI'S i save the test data to function module. we are getting all standard errors for faulty items but we are not getting custom error messages.
Regards,
Upendra.
Hi Vijay,
I did notice if I run the download of the object - DNL_CUST_PAYPL, the FM -/PMENC/P_CHK_CARD_TOKEN is placed in the checking rule records.
Thanks
Shilpi
Hi Rosh,
Thank you for the reply.
When I go to transaction MN10, I only see below options and LPJ1 is not one of them. I did however maintained the condition record for LPH1. is that not the correct one?
Thanks
| LPE2 | SchAgrmtSchedLi-noGR |
| LPE6 | EDI output |
| LPET | SchedAgrmtSchedLine |
| LPF2 | SchAgrmtCumQty-no GR |
| LPFZ | SchAgrmt ***. Qty |
| LPH1 | SchedAgrmtSchedLine |
| LPMA | SchedAgrmt Dunning |
Hi Kumar,
As per my understanding, change in Q-Level is a function of RR + UD, based on the data maintained in QDQL table. For example, if RR is not done and UD is done, then that too have an impact on automatically changing the Q-level. So, I am not aware of any such standard functionality, which can be followed to push to 'SKIP' stage for Q-level based on time.
But you can definitely try for some enhancements to fix your new business requirement. But be informed that you can't get a perfect report never on the actual Q-level as system is always going to calculate programmatically the new level.
For example, you can try to maintain the DMR data as below -
Q-Level 0001 - Test 2 =>
If UD = A (System date < GR date + 15 days) => Continue the same Q-Level.
If UD = A (System date > GR date + 15 days) => Change to Q-Level 0002
If UD = R => (System date < GR date + 15 days) => Continue the same Q-Level.
If UD = R => (System date > GR date + 15 days) => Change to Q-Level 0002
Q-Level 0002 - Test 2 =>
If UD = A (GR Date + 15 days < System Date < GR + 30 days) => Continue the same Q-Level.
If UD = A (GR date + 45 days > System Date > GR + 30 days) => Change to Q-Level 0001
If UD = R (GR Date + 15 days < System Date < GR + 30 days) => Continue the same Q-Level.
If UD = A (GR date + 45 days > System Date > GR + 30 days) => Change to Q-Level 0001
Now this approach covers the Q-Level update for upto 15 days, between 15 upto 30 days, between 31 till 45 days. but other repetitions are not available and for this approach, you should build in programmatic logic to select the Q-level 0001 or 0002.
But honestly, this is something you should do a thorough test before suggesting this option to clients.
Thanks,
Arijit
Hi Experts,
Could you please advice me on this my below explained query.
Currently, I am configuring SSP/OSP for one of my customer.
customer request:- They want to pay SSP/OSP according to work-schedule which is (Mon-Friday) only for five days.So i have no issue setting QDP for SSP but i stuck while try to configure QDP for OSP scheme.
Please advice me how to set this up for occupational sickness scheme , i want system to consider only mon-friday for OSP.
Regards
Jay
Hi Husein,
First you should clarify if you wish to go through the Quality Inspection route or not. If you need to follow QI process, then create UD code & Catalogs in QS51 and then process your inspection lots linked to the quality hold stock. That should free the material form Quality Hold stock to Unrestricted stock.
I believe you can't now revert all the material documents as you have completed the steps till MIRO, and payments were already credited to the vendors. So, material document cancellation may not be possible at this moment of time.
The next option will be to use SAP Note 48815 program to move the Q-hold stock to unrestricted stock. This process will settle the issue you are currently facing, but this is not a process fix!! You will still have to make a plan as to which way you need to work on in future, means with QM flows or without QM flows, and then work accordingly.
Thanks,
Arijit
Thank you very much Ajay, you really provided useful information based on real experience.
Regarding the four topics you mentioned, no they are not required, although we might quickly pass by Live Office during Dashboards Designer training, but we won't focus on it.
The customer wants his staff trained on the tools I mentioned, so that they become able of creating whatever reports they might need in the future.
Olá Gregori
1) Primeiro você deve definir o método de envio de e-mail:
Administração >> Inicialização do sistema >> Configurações gerais >> Serviços
Método do e-mail predefinido:
* SAP Business One Mailer
2) Em seguida faça as definições nas Configurações de impressão
Administração >> Inicialização do sistema >> Configurações de impressão (por documento)
* Exportar para PDF
3) Entre em Impressão em Lote, filtre os documentos e marque os documentos que deseja enviar
Vendas - C/R >> Impressão de Documentos.
4) Confirme as pessoas de contato e os endereços de e-mail.
Espero ter ajudado com as dicas acima. Qualquer coisa é só perguntar!
Abs,
Marcelo Silva Santos
Dear Experts,
When i installed the sap system in first cluster node in windows 2012 standard edition. We are getting the error "Could not set properties on ClusterResource 'SAP XXX IP'."
Kindly help on this.
-warm regards,
Yonten Tshering
Hi,
Can we setup a email trigger when the production confirmations are going into error to the user's .
Thanks
RGP
Hello
Try with transaction COOIS.
BR
Caetano
thank you,
but that is not my solution.
I`m looking for a solution which WebIDefaultStyleSheet.css file
regards
Chris
Alin:
As mentioned in previous posts, based off SAP's standard functionality the MRP controller in material master in ECC is not mapped to the production planner field in the APO. You would be needing an enhancement by using the following user exit.(APOCF005).
Use the following SAP OSS Note 520561-Maintaining product master in R/3 or in APO.
Regards
Hi Tiago,
I checked the requirement time and I shared with Brahmankar.
But I am not sure about this dates. I can see different dates for the same object according my print-screen.
Thanks
Parise.
I see where you are coming from. Unfortunately I cannot make any changes to the REGION or other source dimensions structure to add properties. Assuming that I can maintain those properties on REGION how would the DESTINATION_APP configuration would look like. I mean, the ADD_DIM, SKIP_DIM and the REC statement.
Also, without maintaining properties can we use multiple(8) REC /COMMIT statement to reset the ADD_DIM initialization.?
Notice that I have made BUSINESS_UNIT and PID dimesion as fixed value. Will a REC statement (need help there) after the below scoping work just to send the first record ?.
*XDIM_MEMBERSET FNO_STATUS = BAS(TOT_STATUS)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET D_VALUE = BAS(TOT_VALUE)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET PROJECTTYPE = BAS(TOTAL_PRJTYPE)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET RPTCUR = USD
*XDIM_MEMBERSET FNO_DATASRC = BAS(TOTAL_ADJ)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET FNO_CATEGORY = ACTUAL
*XDIM_MEMBERSET BENEFITTYPE = BAS(TOT_BENEFITTYPE)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET REGION = BAS(TOT_REGION)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET FNO_FUNCTION = BAS(LOG)
*XDIM_MEMBERSET FNO_ACCOUNT = BI_NON_CAPITAL
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TIME = 2016.JAN
*DESTINATION_APP = MODEL-B
*ADD_DIM DATASRC = D_IMT
*ADD_DIM CATEGORY = ACTUAL
*ADD_DIM BUSINESS_UNIT = Logistics
*ADD_DIM PID = PID_Loc1
*SKIP_DIM = FNO_STATUS, D_VALUE, PROJECTTYPE, BENEFITTYPE,
Hi All,
Any inputs on this please .
Thank you in advance.
Ashok
Moderator message.
Please do not ignore moderation. This is a FAQ and was rejected just a couple minutes ago.
See the moderator notes by clicking the Action icon and then open the Notification tab.
This discussion will also be removed soon
I can immediately find 19 discussion when searching with the message number
and another 34 discussions with the message leaving of course the year
and 57 discussions if I erase the WE from the message too, since it does not matter if it is WE or WA the customizing is done at the same place
What is so difficult in searching and reading existing discussions?
Hi,
We have implemented in new STO process. we have issue with SD billing
Issue : We had created STO PO with tax condition types (Maintained static in pricing procedure) and subsequent transaction are posted (Del & GI). During Billing (VF01) both SD and MM condition types are displayed. How to remove MM condition types in SD Billing. Can any one help me out
Note: Condition type mentioned in the screen shot are available in both SD & MM pricing procedure.
Regards
Hemachandran
Good afternoon experts
We are trying to use the FRB1 condition to launch the freight, as Figure 1, but the total amount of this debt to more than a cost center, as Figure 2, when recording the purchase order appears a message, as Figure 3 .
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
When we launch the NF-e (NF) of the request for purchase MIRO not appear a second line of the additional cost, as Figure 4.
Figure 4
Has anyone experienced this or know how to adjust to consider this division by cost center as is the division of the value of the item?
Thank you very much
Hugs
Paul Kanofre
Vejam se o artigo abaixo complementa esta informação: